| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Rename traits' functions to be more explicit.
Most of the changes are pretty old and I can't read
them at this time, sorry.
Adjust usages.
Issue: #825
Reported-by: @DanielKinsman
|
|
- use `static constexpr inline' to avoid requiring
explicit declarations in object code
- use `const Foo* const' to maybe put into readonly
binary segment (at least for ELF DSOs)
- `constexpr' in function scope has storage, avoid
`static'
- don't use `constexpr' where there's no advantage,
like arrays
We'd like to avoid overhead of atomic initialization
for each function call. No idea how `static constexpr'
requiring storage in the standard plays with atomic
initialization requirement. Hearsay points that
`constexpr' without `static' in block scope behaves
more to our liking. It's all hazy though.
I'm not 100% sure if `static inline constexpr' has any
storage. Hopefully none, like a #define, and stuff
bigger than registers gets coalesced within the same
module, with small stuff being immediates.
|
|
Don't include current settings headers. Once they change the old
migration needs rewriting. Rewrite it now and make it a point not to
include current headers.
The old Accela migration is pointless given that settings changed max
values.
|
|
Due to fucking AT&T vs BSD suit copyright defaults to all rights
reserved. Fuck Berne Convention as well.
|
|
|
|
|
